...
This sample grade distribution table includes all the elements shown above. Remember that this is an example, only - you don’t have to create such a detailed table if you don’t find it helpful.
Week | Assignment | Points | Method | Units | Estimated Time per Unit | Total Grading Time Estimate (Minutes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Course Syllabus and Syllabus Quiz | 5 | Automated | 30 | 0 | 0 |
Video Introductions | 15 | Instructor graded | 30 | 2 | 60 | |
Discussion 1 | 20 | Instructor graded | 30 | 5 | 150 | |
Reading Quiz | 10 | Automated | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
Reflection Assignment | 10 | Instructor graded | 30 | 10 | 300 | |
2 | Discussion 2 | 20 | Instructor graded | 30 | 5 | 150 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reading Quiz | 10 | Instructor graded | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
Team Project Scope Assignment | 30 | Instructor graded | 6 | 20 | 120 | |
3 | Discussion 3 | 20 | Instructor graded | 30 | 5 | 150 |
Reading Quiz | 10 | Automated | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
Reflection Assignment | 10 | Instructor graded | 30 | 15 | 450 | |
4 | Discussion 4 | 20 | Instructor graded | 30 | 5 | 150 |
Reading Quiz | 10 | Automated | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
Team Project Draft | 50 | Instructor graded | 6 | 30 | 180 | |
Individual Peer Reviews of Drafts (2 reviews per person) | 50 | Instructor graded | 30 | 10 | 300 | |
5 | Discussion 5 | 20 | Instructor graded | 30 | 5 | 150 |
Reading Quiz | 10 | Automated | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
Reflection Assignment | 10 | Instructor graded | 30 | 15 | 450 | |
6 | Discussion 6 | 20 | Instructor graded | 30 | 5 | 150 |
Reading Quiz | 10 | Automated | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
Team Project Final Submission | 200 | Instructor graded | 6 | 30 | 180 | |
7 | Discussion 7 | 20 | Instructor graded | 30 | 5 | 150 |
Reading Quiz | 10 | Automated | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
Team Project Presentations | 150 | Instructor | 6 | 30 | 180 | |
Peer Feedback on Presentations | 50 | Instructor graded | 30 | 15 | 450 | |
Final Reflection | 10 | Instructor graded | 30 | 10 | 300 | |
Total | - | 800 | - | - | - | - |